 |
 |
Janet Jackson's Right Tit - Blog Day Afternoon
Posted by Jeff (Monday February 02 2004 @ 10:04PM EST)
|
|
The day after its showcase game, the NFL commissioner is nothing short of irate. The Chairman of the FCC called it a "classless, crass and deplorable stunt." He promised further investigation. The San Jose Mercury News declared it a "filthy mess." What's the fuss? Janet Jackson's bust.
During the halftime show, Jackson and some guy named Justin Timberlake sang a duet as the latter fondled the sister of an alleged child molester. For the grand finale, Timberlake was supposed to rip a piece of leather off Jackson's top to reveal a red lace garment, instead he revealed her right breast. That's the duo's version. Most of America is too upset to consider details. Of concern to many people was the fact that a naked boob was seen on television. Early reports indicate that it was seen by children.
BIG FUCKING DEAL!
|
|
|
 |
|
By Jeff (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 08:38AM EST)
|
Yeah the Lingerie Bowl! Unfortunately we were told we needed some sort of "box" in order to watch scantily clad women wrestle in their underwear. So we left the channel on CBS...
When Janet's boob was exposed, Mark and I noticed where as Suzanne and Cher did not. I suppose that alone speaks volumes about the nature of men and women.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
|
By MattC (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 08:52AM EST)
|
Is this really a big deal? I am guessing most of America doesn't give a shit. The FCC tyrants do, of course. Unsure why tits shouldn't be shown, they still have to prevent it. Unless it is an A&E documentary on Woodstock. Or a National Geographic program. Then tits are OK. This is all very complicated - us citizens can't understand it. Trust the government, they know best.
Anyway this is the first I heard of it. But then I was at a Super Bowl party for only an hour and a half. I remember seeing a flubbed field-goal attempt. When I forgot the sheet showing the quarterly scores on which I had bet, there was no point in watching the game. Plus, I had to play a sport that night, rather than sit on my ass and watch others do it.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
 |
|
By Jeff (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 08:56AM EST)
|
I like MattC. He's the only person in America who can make me not look holier-than-thou.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
 |
|
By MattC (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 09:24AM EST)
|
It is a tough job, but someone has got to do it.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
|
By Jeff (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 10:11AM EST)
|
My wife complains about the snow that we've been having. We don't get snow, Canada gets snow.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
By Spaniard (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 10:49AM EST)
|
I've never understood this american obsession with blocking nudity on TV. It's OK to have super violent shows where people get mamed, stabed, shot, blown up, tortured, raped, etc, etc. But show a boob, and all hell brakes loose. I ask you, what is more damaging to children's psyche (if that's what we truly are concerned about)? Seeing the occasional boob or seeing people get blown up? To me that's a no brainer. For some reason there is this puritanical mindset when it comes to nudity that I just don't get. Maybe it's that liberal european upbringing in me..
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
By Funkman (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 11:46AM EST)
|
One of the boner drugs can last 36 hours. But it had a disclaimer stating they hadn't tested it in clinical whether that 36 hour time window may include multiple performances.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
 |
|
By Cher (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 12:06PM EST)
|
What about the disclaimer on the ad that said something like "see a doctor if your erection lasts longer than 4 HOURS!"
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
|
By Anonymous (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 01:01PM EST)
|
see a doctor if your erection lasts longer than 4 hours? Hell forget the doctor, and get your wifes sister/best looking best friend
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
 |
|
By MattC (Tuesday February 03 2004 @ 04:51PM EST)
|
Is this the first nudity on Blogday? Has the site gone pr0n? Will the next article tell us about hot young bitches, ready and waiting?
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
|
By GregS (Thursday February 05 2004 @ 10:45AM EST)
|
And, of course, explicit violence, gore, etc on TV for the kiddies is fine. Much better they see that then a naked woman, yup.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
By Breast Enlargement (Sunday November 28 2004 @ 09:48PM EST)
|
NFL Executive Vice President Joe Browne makes a statement regarding the Super Bowl halftime show. It displays his disappointment by the elements displayed. It's most unlikely that MTV will be given a chance to produce another Super Bowl halftime again
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
By Breast Enhancement (Sunday November 28 2004 @ 09:49PM EST)
|
I do not understand why are there so much attention given over this incident. Janet is not to be blamed totally. Justin should shoulder the responsibility too.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
By Breast Augmentation (Sunday November 28 2004 @ 09:50PM EST)
|
Top CBS executives approved a musical skit where Janet Jackson would expose her breast during the MTV-produced Super Bowl half-time concert, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. "The decision to go forward went to the very top of the network," a well-placed source explained from New York.
|
|
[ reply | parent ]
|
|
 |
|
Enlighten me, Marge
|
The most formidable weapon against errors of any kind is reason.
-- Thomas Paine
|
|
We Did Our Job!
|
|
 |