Blog Day Afternoon - web news management   A proud member of the reality-based community.
BDA news | features | search | archive | contribute | links | polls | stats | contact
find
Topics
  • American Empire (238)
  • Blog Day Afternoon (356)
  • Children (35)
  • Democrats (7)
  • Disputations (51)
  • Fat People (27)
  • General (92)
  • Media Matters (45)
  • Nutters (98)
  • Recommendations (35)
  • Republicans (15)
  • Santorum Watch (17)
  • Sports (109)
  • Squirrels (8)
  • Technology (20)
  • The War On... (70)
  • Week In Review (38)


  • More Links
  • Chicken Hawk database
  • Print this story  
  • Email to a friend


  • Features
  • Blog Day FAQ
  • In The News
  • Most Recent Comments
  • Ski California
  • Ski Hawaii
  • Ski Maine
  • Ski New Hampshire
  • Ski New York
  • Ski Pennsylvania
  • Ski Vermont


  • Sponsors
    Hosted Labs
    Go Amish!
    Qube Factory
    Tomcat FAQ

    Top 5 Stories
  • Killing me softly for big tits (18)
  • Where Have You Gone, Mr. Microphone? (7)
  • There's Going To Be A Floody, Floody (8)
  • Lenny Sans Squiggy (15)
  • Robotripping (254)


  • The War On... Chicken Hawks - The War On...
    Posted by Jeff (Friday March 14 2003 @ 12:27PM EST)
    The New Hampshire Gazette claims to be the nation's oldest newspaper. But its finest contribution to the annals of public information dissemination is its Chicken Hawk database. Chicken hawks, or pussies as I like to call them, are people who advocate military solutions to political problems while they have failed to "take advantage of a significant opportunity to serve in uniform during wartime." In other words, they advocate war to advance a political solution without the stomach to personally implement such policies.

    Chicken hawks should not be confused with cowards. Fear is an innate attribute which has helped preserve humanity. It is rational to fear war and the increased possiblity of death. Personally my coat of arms features a cringing chicken. Pussies, or chicken hawks as the New Hampshire Gazette likes to call them, fear war as much as the rest of us. The bellocosity they display in spite of their cowardice is the trait which separates them from the humans.

    When they're not advocating military solutions to political problems, chicken hawks engage themselves in the avoidance of the types of missions they advocate. These apostles of war have avoided it by virtue of sore assholes, obesity, and--in the case of missle salesman Frank Gaffney--zits. But what separates the chicken hawks from the masses is their propensity to recommend wars staffed with participants other than themselves and their children.

    Take the case of Rush Limbaugh an outspoken proponent of military action against Iraq and quintesscential chicken hawk. When he first came of draft age, the Vietnam War played nightly on television and frankly it looked pretty scary. During the war's 1969-1970 prime time season, Limbaugh held a college deferment by virtue of his enrollment in Southeast Missouri State University. But when college became a little too rough for him, Limbaugh dropped out just as the major networks were re-upping their contracts for the war's return the following season. So Limbaugh did what any advocate of military action would do. He had his doctor write a note indicating that he had a "inoperable pilonidal cyst." This apostle of war avoided Vietnam by virtue of a sore asshole.

    But not every chicken hawk is as clearly defined as Rush Limbaugh. What about former president, Bill Clinton? Slick Willie's avoidance of military duty was dubious at best, but is he chicken hawk material? On this regard, I'll defer to the judgement of the New Hampshire Gazette. "He may have launched a few cruise missiles to distract us from a dalliance with a girl half his age, but our judges believe he wasn't bellicose enough to make the cut. Your mileage may vary."

    I encourage you to study the chicken hawk database. [see link above.] What you'll find a Who's Who of contemporary war advocates who managed to shirk similar duty in youth. As I've said before, I would have no problem with this war if the Bush daughters led a charge of Senator's sons through the gates of Baghdad. That charge will instead be led by the poor who were promised they would be all that they could be.

    For further reading: http://www.awolbush.com

    < Iraq Defector? What Iraqi Defector? | The People I've Seen & the Places I've Peed >

    No user comments.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    URL
      Remember my information (uses cookies)
      I would rather be anonymous
    Comment:

    * HTML tags are allowed.
    * Your email will not be made public.
    * LINK SPAM WILL BE DELETED!

    Enlighten me, Marge
    The most formidable weapon against errors of any kind is reason.
    -- Thomas Paine


    We Did Our Job!


    Copyright © 2003 Blog Day Afternoon
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.